Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Timo Stodder vs Pavel Nejedly Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stodder vs Nejedly analysis and find out who is favored!
Timo Stodder vs Pavel Nejedly Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stodder has won 46.33% of points on his second serve, while Nejedly has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stodder, in recent form, has won 51.16% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nejedly has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.74% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stodder has saved 53.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nejedly has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stodder has won 56.06% of matches played (W/L 37/ 29), with Nejedly winning 28.57% (W/L 2/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stodder has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 21/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 14/ 11). Nejedly has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 10/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Stodder has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 18/ 18), where as Nejedly has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 2/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Stodder winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Stodder winning 4 and Nejedly winning 0. The last match between Stodder and Nejedly was at the M15 Opatija, 21-03-2023, First, Clay with Timo Stodder getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Stodder and Nejedly have played a deciding set 0 times, with Stodder winning 0 times and Nejedly 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Stodder winning 0, and Nejedly 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stodder has played against opponents with an average rank of 229 while Nejedly has played against players with an average rank of 135.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stodder has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nejedly has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stodder has converted 47.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nejedly has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Stodder 2 - 0 Nejedly
326
Rank
257
High
27
Age
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
889
Rank
452
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
65% (196-106)
Career Total W/L
53% (265-232)
36% (4-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Timo Stodder | Pavel Nejedly |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:30 | 1:14:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (57/111) | 60% (55/91) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (39/57) | 47% (26/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (33/54) | 36% (13/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (10/14) | 15% (2/13) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (52/91) | 35% (39/111) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Timo Stodder
Player
Pavel Nejedly
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Pavel Nejedly
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Timo Stodder | Pavel Nejedly |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 36% (9/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (109/135) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 34 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 30 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:46 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 81.18 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (490/791) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (300/490) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (139/301) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (31/59) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (310/792) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Timo Stodder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
6-7(2) 6-1 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Denis Petak
75%
(
67 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
14
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
96
Total Points Won
101
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Marko Maksimovic
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Timo Stodder
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
14
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Timo Stodder
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
49%
(
63 of
129)
1st Serve %
48%
(
48 of
101)
10
Aces
6
11
Double Faults
4
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
44%
(
29 of
66)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
56 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Timo Stodder
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Timo Stodder
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Timo Stodder
43%
(
32 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Pavel Nejedly Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Pavel Nejedly
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pavel Nejedly
Player
Vojtech Vlkovsky
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Werren
Player
Pavel Nejedly
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiri Barnat
Player
Pavel Nejedly
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pavel Nejedly
Player
Giuseppe Tresca
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Pavel Nejedly
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Manuel Guinard
Player
Pavel Nejedly
40%
(
17 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danil Panarin
Player
Pavel Nejedly
48%
(
36 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Pavel Nejedly
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Pavel Nejedly
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
85%
(
60 of
71)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stodder Vs Nejedly Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
